Monday, May 5, 2014

The "Acceptable Sins"

Categories of absolute self-denial are, basically, three. We mentioned two: Israeli- specific prohibitions (pork chops, etc.), and universal prohibitions (whom to worship and with whom to engage in sexual activity).

The third category builds on the second and has to do with what C. S. Lewis called the “acceptable” sins. Here freedomists stumble badly in that they make the same mistake as legalists. While legalists tighten the screws with new rules, freedomists bring in the dumpster and throw out everything except "judge not." At the same time both practice the “acceptable” sins without blushing.


What are these “acceptable” sins? Here are two listings of actions and attitudes which are discernible and subject to rebuke, correction and instruction in righteousness. In Romans the list describes why these things are embedded in our sin nature. In Colossians we are told that these things are to be “put off" rather than practiced freely or even in moderation. That second list alone would reduce a significant amount of legalist and freedomist content on Facebook.






These are issues of worship. They are the heartbeat of the prayer, “My Kingdom Come, My Will Be Done.” They have to do with someone crossing the border of my cosmic domain without bowing to my presence and will. They are the subjects of three questions which have been forwarded to expose the idols of our hearts.


Am I willing to sin to get it?
Am I willing to sin to keep it?
Am I willing to sin if I lose it or can’t have it?


Does grace give the freedom to excuse these in my life? No. Grace implants a, “God forbid,” in the heart. An awe of God’s love which declares war on such embedded orientations en route to the complete change to be enjoyed inChrist’s presence.

The sixth in the Withered Grape series: an examination of self control and its place in twenty-first century Christian circles.

Previous articles in this series.


No comments:

Post a Comment